Log in

No account? Create an account
July 2019   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31


Posted on 2009.09.18 at 14:09
Current Mood: fullfull
Current Music: The Winner Takes It All - Abba
We will soon know whether the 2016 Olympics are to take place here in Chicago. Inevitably and predictably, this issue has been tossed back and forth between various factions, mindsets, and ideologies.

The first division is between those who don’t believe in the Olympics at all, regardless of location, versus those who see the Olympics as a powerful symbol and example of international cooperation.

Next, we have those who believe that the IOC and the USOC are corrupt, elitist organizations that ought to go away; that they are always on the lookout for large bribes and are very comfortable with having their asses kissed, versus those who either don’t see them that way or who believe that this is a small, perhaps necessary, price to pay for the existence of this wonderful institution.

More locally, we have Chicagoans who support the games either because they believe there’s money in it for them or because they are genuinely thrilled at the idea of Chicago being placed on the world stage as never before. Across the fence from them are the Chicagoans who view the local power structure as utterly corrupt and figure that someone is going to make a killing – probably at the considerable expense of the masses.

So it comes down to me now. I’m a Chicagoan – do I want our Olympic bid to be accepted? My feelings are a little mixed up on that score. On the one hand, I find it utterly plausible that someone has got my pocketbook squarely in their sights, and that the IOC, the USOC, the mayor, and select contractors/connected parties may very well be in this to make a big money grab. Still, none of that surprises me. I’m cynical enough that I think the vast majority of really BIG projects involve corruption, political maneuvering, favoritism, and cost overruns into the pockets of connected individuals. So it was in the ancient world; so it remains today. I’m not crazy about it, but I’m not going to just wish it away.

On the other hand, I have a romantic side that cries out: “We do not do this because it is a GOOD idea. No! Not at all! We do it because it is a GLORIOUS idea! If you are fortunate, you may see such a spectacle come to your city once in your life, so do not turn blithely away when such an international spectacle presents itself upon your doorstep.” Oh, I know how that sounds – it isn’t logical; it isn’t scientific; it isn’t all sorts of things. But it IS human. We are not logic machines – not very good ones anyway – and we never can become logic machines without becoming something other than human. So the part of me that embraces the Olympics is something human; something essential; something I must be true to in some manner.

So is that it then? Sign off on the Olympics and let the Corrupt Ones have their way with me and my foolish dreams? Sell myself out to the Fantasy Merchants? Not a very appetizing scenario when I put it that way, is it? It is also well worth noting that the Olympics happen because thousands upon thousands of people all over the world – who aren’t getting rich – are working their butts off to be a part of something they fervently believe in. And that is why I describe my feelings as ‘a little mixed up.’ This I know – whatever choice the IOC makes, there is a part of me that will rejoice, and a part of me that will feel a little sad.


(Anonymous) at 2009-09-19 06:38 (UTC) (Link)


Chicago is, unlike Detroit, a living and vibrant city worthy of investment because those with money can make more money. Capitalism is itself a controlled form of corruption. That's why people like Osama Bin Laden want to do away with it. However, as far as I know, Afghanistan is unlikely to be hosting the Olympics any time soon.
-- ggreen
(Anonymous) at 2009-09-28 14:39 (UTC) (Link)

Sept 18 & 21

Your entries from the 18th & 21st remind me of Sweetest Heart of Mary church in Detroit. They have a very large stain-glass window that won an award at the 1901(?) Chicago World's Fair. You stated that the 2016 Olympics would place Chicago "on the world stage as never before". I imagine that there would have been some future-seeing fair-goers who would have taken exception to the idea of a series of sporting events outshining the eye-popping marvels presented at the World's Fair !
charlesofcamden at 2009-09-28 15:29 (UTC) (Link)

Re: Sept 18 & 21

The two big world's fairs that have taken place in Chicago are the 1893 Columbian Exposition and the 1933 Century of Progress Exhibition. The former marked the 400th anniversary of Columbus' trip to the New World, while the latter marked the 100th anniversary of the founding of Chicago. I thought about both of those events when I remarked about putting Chicago "on the world stage as never before." That's not to say that it would be bigger or better necessarily, but with the presence of modern electronic media, it would put Chicago on display in a unique manner unprecedented for our town. I may have mentioned this before, but I think you'd really enjoy the stained glass museum at Navy Pier. It covers a wide range of styles, eras, and subject matter. Come to think of it, there's a photo I took there on the cover of the calendar I sent out last December, if you'd like a little taste.
Previous Entry  Next Entry